Ethics Board Reports

Ethics Board Report - EB-002

HABBO WHITE HOUSE

Department of Justice  •  Ethics Board

Public Report of the Ethics Board

Issued pursuant to Part 7 of the Prosecution Act 2025

Honourable Members and Members of the Public,

This report is published in accordance with Part 7, Section 4 of the Prosecution Act 2025, following the conclusion of the Ethics Board convened to review the evidence submitted in the matter set out below. It records the evidence in question, the outcome of the Board’s vote, a summary of both sides of the argument, and closing remarks.

1.  The Matter Before the Board

2.  Composition of the Board

The Board was constituted under Part 7 of the Prosecution Act 2025, chaired by the Attorney General and deputy-chaired by the President-Elect. All members confirmed in writing their willingness to serve impartially and in compliance with White House law prior to disclosure of the matter.

3.  The Evidence in Question

The appellant submitted four (4) images intended to demonstrate that she had accessed the White House website, contrary to the finding of inactivity that led to her dismissal. The images comprised website screenshots, browser history, a Habbo client message view, and associated timestamps. As the material did not, on its face, satisfy the evidentiary requirements of Part 6, it was referred to this Board for certification on moral and ethical grounds.

Scope of review:  Consistent with Part 7, the Board did not determine the merits of the underlying dismissal. Its sole task was to decide, by majority vote, whether the evidence is legitimate — genuine, unmodified and uncontaminated — and fit to be certified on moral and ethical grounds.

4.  Result of the Vote

Determination:  By a majority of 5 to 1, the Board resolved to CERTIFY the evidence. In accordance with Part 7, this review is final and may not be overturned or ignored by any authority.

5.  Summary of Both Sides of the Argument

In favour of certification (majority)

• The screenshots appear consistent, unaltered and contextually credible, with no signs of manipulation, fabrication or unethical presentation.
• The timestamps shown are broadly consistent with the events presented; the second image, though difficult to read, appears on close inspection to show 10 June.
• The communications are professional in tone and align with expected administrative procedures.
• Where certain images do not capture every corroborating detail (e.g. a full activity log or uninterrupted timeline), this affects the weight the evidence may later carry — not its authenticity — and is not a sufficient basis to reject it.

Opposed to certification (minority)

• Compliance: the website screenshots do not clearly show that “evidence mode” was enabled as Part 6 requires; the chat image is a private window without the room-information box; and one image carries no independently visible date or time.
• Completeness: a gap in the captured conversation (marked “18 hours ago”) suggests part of the exchange may be missing, such that the record may not be a fair and complete enough basis for certification.
• On these grounds the minority was not satisfied the evidence could be certified as it stood, and invited production of the missing portion or further corroboration before the vote concluded.

6.  Members’ Final Notes

An optional section is provided under Part 7, Section 4 for any member wishing to record final remarks. No further individual notes were submitted beyond the reasoning summarised above; the section is retained for completeness.

7.  Closing Statement of the Attorney General

The Board discharged its duty with diligence, professionalism and impartiality throughout, and completed its review within the timeframe prescribed by Part 7. The Chair thanks each member for their service. The evidence having been certified by majority vote, it may now be used in accordance with the law, subject to all applicable punishment provisions and the requirement that no unreasonable punishment be imposed. This decision is final.

Signed,

ICEMAN

Attorney General

Chairman of the Ethics Board

Department of Justice

Prepared by:

notsyam

Solicitor General
Department of Justice

Justice

• Hearings
• Judicial Reviews
• Ethics Board Reports
• Freedom of Information
• Training Kick on Sight
• Ban on Sight
• National Punishment
• Hiring Blacklist