Information
This case is filled against IDF, BAF, slazengers and the users on the IDF BoS annex.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
In my official capacity as the Attorney General of the Department of Justice, bring these proceedings on behalf of the Department of Defense against the Habbo organization commonly known as the **British Armed Forces**, hereinafter referred to as the BAF.
These proceedings seek the authorization and imposition of a Ban on Sight placement and a National Punishment placement against the BAF, its responsible leadership, its affiliated personnel, and any accounts or subordinate organizations established or operated for the purpose of continuing its activities or circumventing an authorized placement.
The Department of Justice is commencing this action because the available evidence establishes substantial grounds to believe that the BAF is not an independent organization operating without connection to previously sanctioned entities. Rather, the BAF appears to share material connections in its founding, ownership, leadership, membership, and operation with the organization known as the IDF, which is already the subject of Ban on Sight and National Punishment measures.
The BAF’s group badges are reportedly owned by GOVBAFRC and are co-owned by, controlled by, or otherwise affiliated with slazengers. Slazengers is already subject to an active Ban on Sight and National Punishment placement arising from that individual’s affiliation with the IDF. Information obtained by the Departments further indicates that individuals identified as IDF founders, leaders, operators, or affiliates have participated in the creation, ownership, leadership, or operation of the BAF.
This overlap is significant because it demonstrates more than incidental contact between the two organizations. It indicates continuity of personnel, authority, interests, and operations. On the evidence presently available, the BAF may reasonably be regarded as an affiliate, successor, continuation, reconstitution, or operational extension of the IDF.
The creation or operation of a new organization does not eliminate the relevance of an existing punishment where the new organization is controlled or operated by substantially the same individuals, advances the same interests, or is used to continue activities associated with the punished organization. Permitting an entity to evade an authorized placement merely by operating under a different name, badge, account, or organizational structure would undermine the effectiveness of the White House’s national security and enforcement mechanisms.
Accordingly, the evidence previously submitted and certified in support of the placements against the IDF is relevant to these proceedings. That evidence is relied upon not solely because of the historical conduct of the IDF, but because the personnel connected to that conduct are reportedly involved in the formation and operation of the BAF.
The action is also supported by information gathered by the Department of State through interviews with representatives of external Habbo organizations. Those interviews provide corroborating accounts concerning the conduct, reputation, affiliations, and perceived threat presented by the IDF and its associated personnel.
The founder of the RPA, Eat!ndatcereal, reportedly informed the Department of State that the IDF had a history involving spamming, trolling, and affiliations with Habbo mafia organizations. The Department was further informed that the IDF had been placed on the RPA’s Ban on Sight list.
Following that interview, the Department of State interviewed **Enneagram**, identified as the EA 1iC of the Habbo Intelligence Agency. During that interview, the Department was reportedly informed that the HIA regarded the IDF as a politically motivated organization operated by individuals associated with Illegal Warfare activities and former mafia membership. This information materially corroborated the concerns raised during the RPA interview.
The Department of State subsequently interviewed **Senator connorathabbo**, identified as the former EA 1iC of the United States Space Force. The Department was informed that the United States Space Force had placed the IDF on its National Punishment list, referred to as its Never Rehire list, and considered the organization to be defamatory and a threat to its community.
These accounts are relevant because they demonstrate that concerns regarding the IDF were not confined to a single individual or organization. Multiple independent Habbo institutions reportedly reached similar conclusions regarding the organization’s conduct, affiliations, and potential threat to their respective communities.
The Department does not rely upon reputation alone. The interview evidence is presented as corroborative material supporting the documented organizational links between the IDF, slazengers, and the BAF. When considered collectively, the evidence demonstrates a pattern of concern across multiple organizations and provides context for evaluating the risks associated with permitting an IDF-affiliated organization to recruit from or operate against the Habbo White House.
The Department’s concerns have been further aggravated by reports that the BAF has engaged in the targeted recruitment or poaching of Habbo White House personnel.
According to the information received, individuals holding positions within the Habbo White House have been approached and encouraged to leave their White House positions and join the BAF. These approaches reportedly included promises or offers of increased compensation as an incentive to abandon their existing positions.
The Department distinguishes this conduct from ordinary public recruitment. General recruitment directed toward the wider Habbo community would not, by itself, necessarily justify the extraordinary placements requested in these proceedings. The reported conduct is materially different because it appears to have been directed specifically toward current White House personnel.
The selection of serving White House personnel as recruitment targets indicates an attempt to obtain the benefit of individuals already trained, trusted, experienced, or positioned within the White House. It also has the foreseeable effect of weakening White House departments by encouraging their personnel to abandon their responsibilities in exchange for higher compensation elsewhere.
This conduct presents several institutional concerns.
First, it threatens the stability and continuity of White House departments by attempting to draw personnel away from their assigned positions.
Second, it may interfere with the Department of Defense’s ability to retain trained personnel and maintain operational readiness.
Third, it creates a potential security concern where personnel with access to internal practices, discussions, procedures, or non-public information are deliberately recruited by an organization connected to a previously sanctioned entity.
Fourth, when considered alongside the BAF’s reported connections to the IDF, the conduct supports an inference that the recruitment was not merely commercial or competitive, but formed part of a broader effort to strengthen an IDF-affiliated organization at the expense of the Habbo White House.
Fifth, the use of promises of higher compensation demonstrates an organized incentive designed to persuade White House personnel to transfer their loyalty, service, and institutional knowledge to the BAF.
The Department is therefore not commencing these proceedings merely because the BAF exists as a competing organization. The action is based upon the combination of the following circumstances:
1. The reported involvement of IDF-affiliated individuals in the founding, ownership, leadership, or operation of the BAF;
2. The ownership or control of BAF badges by GOVBAFRC and the reported co-ownership, control, or affiliation of slazengers;
3. The fact that slazengers is already subject to active Ban on Sight and National Punishment placements arising from IDF affiliation;
4. The substantial continuity between the personnel associated with the IDF and the personnel associated with the BAF;
5. The evidence previously certified in support of the placements imposed against the IDF;
6. The corroborating information obtained from representatives of the RPA, the Habbo Intelligence Agency, and the United States Space Force;
7. The reported history of spamming, trolling, defamatory conduct, politically motivated activity, Illegal Warfare associations, and mafia affiliations attributed to the IDF;
8. The reported targeting and attempted recruitment of current Habbo White House personnel;
9. The use of increased compensation as an inducement for White House personnel to leave their positions and join the BAF;
10. The resulting threat to White House personnel retention, departmental stability, institutional integrity, and national security; and
11. The risk that the BAF, its subordinate organizations, or newly created groups may be used to evade or circumvent the existing placements imposed against the IDF and its affiliates.
The Department further relies upon the evidence identified as Annexes A through I.
Annexes A and B have reportedly been reviewed and certified by an Ethics Board.
Annexes C, D, E, F, G, and H are represented as complying with the evidentiary requirements established under the Prosecution Act 2025.
Annex I was reportedly reviewed and certified by an Ethics Board on July 26, 2026.
The certification and evidentiary compliance of these annexes are material because the Department seeks to ensure that the requested placements are based upon admissible, authenticated, and properly reviewed evidence rather than unsupported allegations.
Any additional screenshots, witness statements, testimony, communications, recruitment records, or other documentation relating to the BAF’s attempts to recruit White House personnel should be separately identified, certified, and submitted as an additional annex in accordance with the applicable evidentiary requirements.
The Department also requests that any authorized placement be sufficiently comprehensive to prevent evasion.
Accordingly, the requested Ban on Sight and National Punishment placements should extend, where supported by evidence, to:
1. The BAF organization and its principal group badges;
2. GOVBAFRC;
3. Slazengers, without prejudice to any placements already in force;
4. Identified owners, founders, leaders, operators, and authorized representatives of the BAF;
5. Confirmed BAF members who knowingly participate in prohibited organizational activity;
6. Alternative accounts belonging to persons subject to the placement;
7. Subgroups created, owned, controlled, or operated by BAF or IDF-affiliated individuals; and
8. Any successor or replacement organization created with the purpose or practical effect of avoiding the placements imposed by the Court or competent authority.
The Department recognizes that punishment should be based upon an established connection to the organization or the prohibited conduct. The requested placement should therefore apply to confirmed members and to persons whose membership, affiliation, control, or use of alternative accounts is established through sufficient evidence. A person should not be punished solely because of an unsupported allegation or casual association.
Nevertheless, the Court or competent authority should retain the power to examine suspected members, affiliated accounts, and successor groups where credible evidence demonstrates that they are acting for, controlled by, or knowingly assisting the BAF or the IDF.
The purpose of these proceedings is protective rather than merely punitive. The Department seeks to protect the Habbo White House, its departments, its personnel, and its institutional integrity from an organization that appears to be connected to a previously sanctioned entity and that has reportedly attempted to recruit serving White House personnel for its own benefit.
The requested placements are necessary to prevent the BAF and its affiliates from:
1. Accessing or disrupting White House rooms and operations;
2. Recruiting additional White House personnel through targeted inducements;
3. Obtaining institutional knowledge or non-public information from current or former personnel;
4. Continuing the activities of the IDF under a different organizational identity;
5. Using alternative accounts, subgroups, or successor entities to circumvent existing punishments;
6. Undermining confidence in the White House’s enforcement and national security mechanisms; and
7. Presenting an ongoing threat to the stability, reputation, personnel, and operations of the Habbo White House.
For these reasons, I am commencing these proceedings in my capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice and on behalf of the Department of Defense.
The Department’s position is that the BAF’s reported organizational connection to the IDF, its association with individuals already subject to national placements, the corroborated concerns raised by external organizations, and its targeted attempts to recruit Habbo White House personnel collectively establish sufficient grounds for judicial or administrative intervention.
The Department therefore respectfully requests that the Court or competent authority:
1. Find that the BAF is affiliated with, connected to, or operating as a successor or continuation of the IDF;
2. Authorize a Ban on Sight placement against the BAF;
3. Authorize a National Punishment placement against the BAF;
4. Extend those placements to responsible owners, founders, leaders, operators, confirmed members, affiliated accounts, and alternative accounts where the required evidentiary connection is established;
5. Extend the placements to any subgroup, successor group, or replacement organization created or operated to circumvent the authorized punishment;
6. Recognize and admit Annexes A through I in accordance with their certifications and the applicable evidentiary rules;
7. Permit the submission of additional certified annexes concerning the reported poaching or targeted recruitment of White House personnel; and
8. Grant any further protective or enforcement order considered necessary to preserve the security, stability, and institutional integrity of the Habbo White House.
In conclusion, I am bringing this action because the evidence indicates that the BAF is materially connected to the IDF, an organization already regarded by multiple Habbo institutions as a threat and already associated with active national placements. The involvement of IDF-affiliated individuals in the BAF’s founding and operation, combined with the participation of slazengers and the reported targeting of White House personnel, creates a substantial and continuing risk to the Department of Defense and the wider Habbo White House.
The Department should not be required to wait until further disruption, infiltration, personnel loss, or circumvention occurs before taking protective action. The evidence presently available provides sufficient grounds to request the imposition of Ban on Sight and National Punishment placements against the BAF and all persons or entities proven to be acting through, for, or on behalf of it.
Signed,
ICEMAN.
Attorney General
Location: Habbo, In client, various rooms.
Date: Since July 2026