Overview

• Type of Hearing: Criminal

• Submitted: 6 days ago (17/Aug/2026 01:09:41 PM UTC)
• Hearing Location:
• Hearing Verdict:

• Date Scheduled:
• Time Scheduled:

Information

I am filing this complaint against Kelpti, Deputy Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, for Negligence of Duties under the Crimes Act 2025, and in the alternative, Perversion of Justice under Part 1, Section 6(2)(3), which concerns purposely preventing any legal process.

The basis of this complaint is that Kelpti, as Deputy Chief Justice, shared senior responsibility with the Chief Justice for the proper administration of the Judiciary, including ensuring that finalized Court Opinions were published and that pending judicial matters received procedural direction within a reasonable timeframe.

INTERP 65 was filed on 30 June 2026 and remained pending for over a month despite reminders being issued on 7 July 2026, 8 July 2026, and 25 July 2026.

INTERP 103 was filed on 8 July 2026 and was not published until 12 August 2026, approximately thirty-five days after submission. Judicial Leadership later acknowledged that the Court had already reached a conclusion, but the response had not been posted because there was uncertainty about how to publish the Court’s conclusion.

AC-115 was referred to Judicial Leadership on 7 August 2026 for guidance on how the appeal should proceed, as it was the first appeal of its kind and required procedural or jurisdictional direction. A follow-up request was made on 14 August 2026. As of 15 August 2026, no decision, determination, or procedural direction had been provided.

This delay directly affected my ability, while serving as Solicitor General, to advise a party on the next steps in AC-115 and prevented the matter from moving forward.

I also have evidence from internal Judicial Branch discussions indicating that only the Chief Justice or Deputy Chief Justice had the access or authority to publish finalized Court Opinions. Since Kelpti held the office of Deputy Chief Justice, she had the authority or ability to act where the Chief Justice failed to do so. Despite this, the relevant opinions and procedural directions remained unpublished or unresolved.

The complaint is therefore based on Kelpti’s failure, as Deputy Chief Justice, to ensure that concluded or pending judicial matters were properly issued, published, or given procedural direction within a reasonable timeframe. This failure caused delay to active legal processes and directly impacted the Department of Justice’s ability to carry out its duties.

Location: Habbo White House website, Supreme Court interpretation/case channels, and official Judicial Leadership communications relating to INTERP 65, INTERP 103, and AC-115.
Date: Between 30 June 2026 and 15 August 2026, with the main incidents involving INTERP 65, INTERP 103, and AC-115.

Court Opinion

Written by GreenArcher on Unknown

The Department of Justice notes that this case was filed by notsyam in his capacity as a member of the Department of Justice at the time.

The present leadership of the Department of Justice is no longer pursuing this case and hereby withdraws these charges.