Court Opinion
Written by .Martin on 07/Apr/2026 06:00:00 PM UTC
The petitioner is requesting the Supreme Court to define Part 1, Section 3(1)(1) of the Crimes Act 2025, more specifically what it means for an employee to "hold 2 ranks simultaneously, in the White House or multiple agencies".
MAJORITY OPINION.—
The clearest and sole indicator of double jobbing is holding one or several locked employee groups of another agency or military, as these are clear proof of mutual recognition between the employee, who has requested membership of the group, and the employer, who has accepted the person into the group.
It is worth noting that this applies to any and all account of an employee at the White House, so if a White House employee's alternative account held a rank at another agency or military, this would constitute double jobbing.
In regards to what an agency is, this is up to the discretionary interpretation of those with the authority to dismiss a person for said offence, which might be overruled by the Supreme Court if a countersuit of unfair punishment is lodged, or with the court upon a lawsuit being filed.
.Martin, D.C.J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which Seas., C.J, SycamoreTree, leslieeee.,.,., S.A.J.J, and nebur, A.J, joined.
