Overview

• Type of Hearing: Appeal

• Submitted: 1 month ago (23/Mar/2026 11:45:29 PM UTC)
• Hearing Location: » [ W H ] - The Supreme Court »
• Hearing Verdict:

• Date Scheduled: 05/Apr/2026
• Time Scheduled: 10:04 AM UTC

Information

Appeal Type
Veteran Status/Badge Removal

---

Explain why your appeal should be successful
[[ Submitted by the Attorney General, shorkmode on behalf of the Habbo Chemz ]]

I am submitting this appeal to formally request the reinstatement of my VIP status.

To begin with, I would like to express my genuine confusion regarding the original decision made against me. To this day, I have not been given a clear or specific reason for my removal. Despite complying fully and willingly with every question and step of the investigation process, I was ultimately denied without any explanation as to what I had supposedly done wrong. This lack of transparency makes it extremely difficult for me to understand, address, or learn from the situation, and raises concerns about the fairness of the outcome.

From my perspective, I have never engaged in any behavior that would justify the removal of my VIP status or label me as a “security risk.” During my time working within WH, I consistently acted in a professional and cooperative manner. Not only did I pose no threat, but I also believe I was a helpful and beneficial presence within the environment. My past conduct reflects this, and there have been no clear incidents presented to contradict that.

---

Justification for the Action you're appealing
I also feel it is important to address the circumstances surrounding my dismissal. I believe this situation may stem from an abuse of power by the previous Chief of Staff. I reported an individual who was known to be a close associate of theirs for inappropriate behavior and poor mannerisms that negatively reflected on WH.
Following this report, I was the one who faced consequences, while the individual in question did not. This outcome felt not only unfair but also backwards, as I acted in what I believed to be the best interest of the organization. I have retained evidence to support these claims if required.

Additionally, one possible factor that may have influenced the decision is my association with a user referenced in my profile. While this individual may have certain affiliations, they are simply an old friend of mine. This connection is purely social and has no bearing on my own actions, judgment, or conduct. It should not be used as a basis to label me a risk, especially when my own track record within WH demonstrates the opposite.

Ultimately, I am not seeking conflict or escalation. I am simply asking for a fair reconsideration of my case. I would like my VIP status reinstated based on my history, my cooperation, and the absence of any clear wrongdoing. If there are specific concerns, I am more than willing to address them directly however, I cannot do so without being informed of what those concerns actually are.

Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. I hope for a fair and transparent reconsideration of this decision.

Court Opinion

Written by Seas. on 05/Apr/2026 01:20:00 AM UTC

In the matter of AC-19 Chemz v. the Department of Justice, the Court of Appeals finds as follows:

We hereby REJECT the appeal on the basis that Chemz did not purchase such VIP status, nor was he awarded such status through employment. Therefore, there is essentially no status to reinstate. The court is unanimous in their decision. Instead, we refer this matter to EOP and or the Department of the Treasury, allowing Chemz to repurchase VIP. Granted that he is not considered a security risk by the Department of Defense or National Security Council.

Presided over by Chief Justice Seas. and joined on the bench by Deputy Chief Justice .Martin , Senior Associate Justice leslieeee.,.,. , Associate Justice nebur , and Deputy Intelligence Director T-im (acting as a replacement Justice).