View a Hearing

Supreme Court

Docket: SC-22
Status: Ruled on by a Court

playergurl

Attorney: Not Assigned

req.

Supreme Court

Attorney: Not Assigned

Overview
  • Type of Hearing: Request
  • Submitted: 1 month ago (26/Mar/2026 01:50:55 PM UTC)
  • Hearing Location:
  • Hearing Verdict:
  • Date Scheduled:
  • Time Scheduled:
Information
Hello, I would like to request an interpretation of the Code of Conduct Act - Specifically around striking and how it pertains to someone who is fired then later rehired under the 2 week minimum time frame of a strike.

Example if someone was fired due to 3 simultaneous strike then rehired but 2 have expired. Would the 1 remaining strike still be active or would the 3 strikes which resulted in firing reset for this different employment period?
Court Opinion

Written by .Martin on 15/Apr/2026 03:45:00 PM UTC

The petitioner is requesting the Supreme Court to clarify the expiration of strikes, as per Part 4, Section 1(1)(6) of the Code of Conduct Act 2025 (as amended by the Code of Conduct (Amendment 2) Act 2026).

MAJORITY OPINION.—

Under the old version of the Code of Conduct Act 2025, Part 3, Section 1(3) gave three possible options for when strikes may be removed: (1) upon the expiration of two weeks, (2) removed early by the person giving the strike and (3) upon successful appeal through official Court proceedings. The Code of Conduct (Amendment 2) Act 2026 changed this. The current version of the Code of Conduct Act 2025, as amended, states in Part 4, Section 1(1)(6) that "Strikes shall expire fourteen (14) days after issuance".

Strikes therefore remain active, even when a person is dismissed or resigns.

If a person, who had strikes when they were dismissed or resigned from the White House or were fired due to receiving a third strike, rejoins the White House before the strike or strikes have expired, they will remain active until the fourteen days have passed. Receiving a third strike will thus bar a member from regaining employment at the White House until the earliest of their three strikes has expired.

.Martin, D.C.J., delivered the majority opinion of the Court, in which Seas., C.J, leslieeee.,.,., nebur, S.A.J.J, and htak, R.J, joined.