Court Opinion
Written by Seas. on 23/Mar/2026 04:50:00 PM UTC
The application for a Ban on Sight placement against HRHCollection and Mayuki is hereby granted.
The Court is unanimous in their decision, deeming the above user(s) a threat to our community. The evidence presented meets the definition of Terrorism as defined by Part 2, Section 1, Subsection 2 of the Defense Act 2025. It is the Court’s opinion that the behaviour demonstrated by these users has no place within our community, nor the platform as a whole.
Both users contributed equally to the above action. Publishing someone's full name online without their consent is to be considered doxing, particularly when this is done to reveal the identity of a previously anonymous or pseudonymous person with the intention of causing harm, harassment, or distress. The intention of the parties here is evident.
We find this behaviour to be particularly egregious, stripping away the privacy of someone by publicly sharing their private information is a foul act. I, for one, am embarrassed that this has to be dealt with in a virtual court setting. Doxxing is a real life offence with a real impact on the victim.
The court hereby issues a suppression order, preventing the publication or disclosure of evidence submitted in accordance with Part 8, Section 8 of the Prosecution Act 2025. This suppression order is permanent.
This hearing was presided over by Chief Justice Seas. , Deputy Chief Justice .Martin , and Senior Associate Justice leslieeee.,.,.